When good orders go bad: Part 1

Part 1
How Did We Get Here?

When Good Orders Go Bad

We’ve all been there at one point or another. You place an order online and things seem to be going well. The transaction goes through correctly, you receive a confirmed order email, and when you check a few days later, an estimated arrival date has appeared on your account. Then the arrival date comes and goes. No package. You wait a few more days. Still no package.

So you call customer support – all you want to do is talk to a real, live person. Ten, twenty minutes pass. Forty minutes go by. At this point it’s a matter of principle to stick it out and talk to someone.

Finally, it’s your turn! You do a little happy dance, knowing that nearly an hour on hold is finally going to pay off! Until it turns out that despite having four different systems that should (theoretically) be able to track your items from order, to fulfillment, to shipping, this rep still has no idea where your order is. Don’t worry though, your request is being escalated to someone who should be able to give you a better answer—can you call back in 24 hours?

When presented with a scenario like this (which, unfortunately, is based on a recent experience I had with a leading brand), it’s easy to feel like large retail organizations are run by faceless goons who only care about making a profit. However, we all know that is simply not the case. No CEO, CIO, or COO sets out to create such a hellacious customer experience because they know that 95% of dissatisfied customers share their experiences1, and that U.S. companies lose billions of dollars annually due to poor customer service 2.

If the stakes are so high, why do so many companies end up in such dire straits? While there can be a variety of reasons, there is a vital clue to one major problem for this particular retailer. Can you spot it?

This is part 1 of a mini series that will explore what actually happens when customers face this kind of trouble with an order, the potential impact that could have on a business’ revenue, operations, and most importantly, customer service.

So, did you spot the problem? It’s the four different systems. Instead of having a single integrated solution that would show the customer service rep the entire story of my order, including the history and current status, she was flipping between systems that were communicating with each other about as well as a sullen teenager when asked about his or her day. In other words: not well. It’s the kind of nightmare scenario that makes most executives wonder, “This is so bad…how did we end up here?”

This isn’t an isolated, or particularly recent issue either. According to a 2013 Forrester study, “42% of service agents are unable to efficiently resolve customer issues due to disconnected systems, archaic user interfaces, and multiple applications.”3  As companies continue to grow, whether through acquisitions or the addition of new channels, product lines, or locations, new problems crop up. The common reaction is to stick a band aid on these issues. New financial system here, different warehousing tool there, 3PL integration over yonder—pretty soon the only thing holding all these systems together is some chewing gum and a prayer.

The band aid reaction is understandable too. In the short term, it’s the cheaper, easier option. But what about the long term costs? As Duncan Taylor, part of the Global Retail Industry arm of Microsoft, pointed out in a webinar, time, money, and energy spent on integrating a multitude of disparate systems is time, money, and energy wasted. Diverting these resources towards implementing a Unified Commerce system (a set of enterprise business tools built to seamlessly work together) would ultimately result in a better customer experience, lower overall cost of ownership, and ultimately a higher ROI.

Which is probably why, according to the IHL Group, unified commerce will be one of the biggest drivers of IT spend over the coming year with over $30B devoted to solving issues like the ones I experienced. But, here’s the thing—there’s a reason why it’s taken the industry so long to catch up with a clearly pressing problem, and why so many smart people still revert to the band aid solution.

To find out what’s keeping major retailers from making the switch to a Unified Commerce solution, how to get over it, and key factors for making sure your IT budget is spent wisely, join us for Part 2 of How Did We End Up Here?

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

Forecast netting: An art and a science

Forecast Netting

It’s an art and a science for accurate supply chain management

In day-to-day operations we focus on demand planning. We focus on supply planning. Then… we seem to lose focus. There is sometimes a sense of wishful thinking that the demand plan that was so diligently generated will magically appear in the supply plan the way we want and everything will work out perfectly!

Unfortunately, real life rarely works that way. It comes down to a fundamental difference in the ways that demand and supply plans are generated. Demand planning tends to be at a higher level—for example, at a style or style-color by week. Supply planning is at the most granular level—say, style-color-size by day. This difference in calculation is further complicated by actual orders coming in. How are they accounted for in the demand plan?

Ultimately it comes down to forecast netting. It can sometimes be tough to realize that netting logic has an impact on how the supply plan should be developed. This brings us back to the million-dollar question: is there a magic formula for how to best net demand? Short answer—not really. Some larger companies choose to run algorithms based on years of historical data, but not every company can access its data easily, or the company may be so new that folks are still figuring things out.

The right answer is depends on how aggressive or conservative your company wants to be when it comes to planning. Deciding whether to net demand at a high level then disaggregate it to lower levels, or vice versa, is an art and a science.

Just be aware that you should be prepared with a contingency plan if your actuals come in higher than your demand plan, or vice versa—but that’s a topic for another day.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

5 things we’ve learned from 100 go lives

5 Things We've Learned From 100+ Go-Lives

One of our proudest accomplishments as a company is that we have completed over 100 successful go lives with Microsoft Dynamics AX. It’s fair to say you’d be hard pressed to find another partner with so many successful, industry-focused deployments. With all that experience under our belt, we’ve learned a few things along the way.

1. Work Hard. Be Honest. Be Nice to People. Ok, so maybe we started the business following these principles, but they are still our number one priority, and the single most important thing about our business. At the end of the day, implementations are people projects, not software projects. We’re incredibly conscious of the way we engage with people, the values of the companies we work with, and we’re asking people to make significant changes in the way they do business. It isn’t easy, and we respect that—because without that respect, projects fail.

2. Go in with a road map to success. Every implementation partner goes into a project with the goal of a successful go live—it just takes some folks longer to get there than others. We’ve meticulously studied and documented what it takes to not only go live on time and on budget, but also what documents and templates a company needs post-go live to ensure that they feel confident with the product after the implementation team has said their goodbyes. We call this toolkit QuickStart and we’ve found that, on average, it shaves about a month off of implementations. Pretty sweet, right?

3. Conference room pilots, conference room pilots, conference room pilots. We won’t pretend that CRPs are anyone’s idea of fun, but there’s a reason we insist on conducting at least three prior to going live—sometimes things go wrong! Successfully implementing Microsoft Dynamics AX is walking a fine line between an art and a science. CRPs ensure that the kinks get out of the system well before the official go live.

4. Better to do one thing well than many things poorly. We often get asked why we don’t branch out into other solutions, verticals, or product lines. The answer is simple: Microsoft Dynamics AX is the best Tier One ERP system on the market today, and we’re the best at implementing it for apparel, footwear, home goods, and durable CPG brands. This intense focus and experience in these industries has led to an intimate understanding of the complex business processes that make them successful.

5. Stay in it for the long haul. Along the way to this milestone of over 100 successful go lives, we learned that sometimes customers may not have the in-house help they need after our consultants go home. We always knew that an implementation didn’t end at go live, but for a while, we didn’t have a process to manage that post-go live relationship. As an extension of our business values and principles (see numbers 1-4) we created Sunrise Global Support. Sunrise Global Support is…exactly what it sounds like. A global network of support personnel that is available 24×7 for any of our customers technical needs, because we know business never stops and glitches don’t wait for Monday.

 

We’ve learned a lot over the last 100 go lives—and we’re positive we’ll learn more as we keep going. Here’s to another 100 go lives and many more after that!

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

To share or not to share, that is the question: Three considerations before sharing services

To share or not to share, that is the question.

Three considerations before sharing services

If you are a part of a large (or growing) organization, you’re probably interested in leveraging your human capital across multiple business units, divisions, regions, or brands. In a relatively short amount of time, shared services have proven to be a popular way for companies to reduce costs, improve customer service, and increase process effectiveness. In fact, in 2011 89% of global executives reported that they thought sharing services was a strategic choice for their business. 1 Yet, these benefits have only become truly feasible in the last few years thanks to advances in business applications and information systems.

With so many advantages to implementing shared services, it may be tempting to get started right away. Before you start consolidating divisions left and right, here are few things to think about to make sure you take full advantage of shared services in your organization:

First, you should define which functions can be shared across your organization. A good place to start is internally facing functions like financials, human resources, information technology, etc. Even in a very diverse organization, these areas are most likely to have enough similarities in methodology and practice that shared services could be easily implemented.

The next thing to think about is creating clear definitions of organizational hierarchy and boundaries. Who can have access to which data? What kind of security settings are required? Can business workflows be directed to shared services for approvals? Taking time to lay out the ground rules and access permissions now could save a great deal of pain later.

Speaking of hierarchies and boundaries, this brings up the most important question. Can your business systems run both shared and segmented functions under a single platform? Shared services personnel won’t be as effective if they’re asked to jump from one application to the next to complete daily operations.

It’s clear that shared services are here to stay, but it’s also not something to rush into. Just imagine how many integrations, security setups, workflow modelings, and data synchronizations must be developed and configured to make shared services work! It’s pretty easy to see why a comprehensive IT strategy must be developed first to realize all the benefits of shared services in the long run.

If you do decide to go the shared services route, it’s worth mentioning that Microsoft Dynamics AX is particularly well suited to handling shared services. For example, take a look at the screen below (Click the image if you’d like to see a bigger version.)

In this view each shared service is clearly defined and is treated like any other organizational structure.

Whether you already have shared services or are thinking about implementing them in your company, it’s always a good idea to make sure you clearly define the functions of your services, set appropriate boundaries, and, ideally, run them under a single platform like Microsoft Dynamics AX.

1 The Shared Services and Outsourcing Revolution is Here, Shared Services and Outsourcing Network, 2011.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

Global templates for ERP deployments — Is it worth it?

Global Templates For ERP Deployments

Is It Worth It?

Don’t panic…your ERP solution will scale…probably.

Have you ever caught yourself lying in bed, staring at the ceiling and worrying about work? Or maybe the barista has asked for your coffee order three times but you haven’t noticed because you’re daydreaming about a new ERP solution. You need one that will support your company’s growth into new global markets, tear down the regional silos, and finally clean up the customization mess. You know there are always challenges with implementing a new system—so would a global ERP template help, or just compound that risk and the cost?

When you finally make the decision to change your overall ERP solution, there comes a point when you need to decide whether deploying a global ERP template across multiple sites, divisions, and regions is worth it or not. The answer to this question will ultimately drive the overall strategy of pretty much every design, development, and deployment decision to come. Not to mention the long-term support of the solution going forward.

You can see why it’s not a question to take lightly.

While defining a global ERP template can reduce implementation and operational costs, and harmonize processes across business units and regions, it certainly isn’t without its own risk or cost. Here are three of the many points to consider when deciding if a global template is right for your organization:

Organizational/Product Diversity

Cat OFfice

Is this your organization? If so, a global template may not be for you.

The first thing you can do may be the easiest or hardest thing to accomplish: evaluate your organization with as little bias as possible. Is getting everyone to agree on a topic like herding sheep, or is it more like wrangling cats? The more centralized the decision-making processes are, the better a fit your organization is for a global template. The more autonomous the management structure is across regions, the greater the challenges you will face trying to standardize these regions to fit the mold of a global template.

Also realize that such centralization may not be necessary for all business functions. Some internal facing workflows such as finance, may be more suitable for a global template, while external facing workflows, such as order to cash, may be less suitable.

One more point to consider—how similar are the products manufactured across the divisions of your business? If each division makes similar products, it will be easier to implement a global template, whereas a varying set of products might not lend itself as well to such a project.

Cost Justification

You will also want to consider the true return on investment for such an initiative. There needs to be a pretty compelling business case to support this kind of undertaking. Let’s be frank: implementing a global template is hard. It’s a consensus-driven design process that needs to be justified by a realistic ROI. Although a global system creates a consensus across diverse business units and regions, provides a more accurate and consistent view of the global business, and is less expensive to support and maintain, the actual implementation will be more costly and complex at the front end of the implementation. That investment needs to be weighed against the benefits of a global template.

Infrastructure

Finally, take stock of whether there is a global infrastructure in place to support such an endeavor. If you are truly running one global template from one instance of the database, users from all over the world will need access at various times of day. This means having reliable and reasonably fast connections for those remote users, as well as round-the-clock support for them if issues arise. You’ll need to consider peak user load times and whether your infrastructure can handle the volume at max capacity. Without such an infrastructure, the template may simply be an interesting yet unachievable idea.

These points aren’t meant to scare anyone away from implementing a global template. They are just three considerations to weigh before a final decision can be made. However, if you can honestly assess the state of your global infrastructure, the sheep-to-cat ratio of your brand, and can justify the upfront cost and effort, you’re well on your way to making an informed decision about what’s right for you. As for the rest of the things to consider—that’s where Sunrise Technologies comes in.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

Are you afraid your implementation will fail?

Are You Afraid Your Implementation Will Fail?

How to avoid ERP implementation failure

Have you been putting off looking for a new ERP system because you don’t want to go through the painful process of an implementation only for it to fail?

CFOs love Microsoft Dynamics AX (now known as Microsoft Dynamics 365 in the cloud) because it saves them money.

CIOs love it because of its ability to adapt to a business means that the implementation will succeed. This adaptability makes it the most implementable ERP system on the market. Why? Because at the end of the implementation process, our customers have more effective information and technology for their business at their fingertips that supports their brand’s growth into new product lines, channels, and global markets.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

Time is money: How we decreased our expensing time by 96%

Time is Money

How sunrise decreased expensing time by 96%

At Sunrise Technologies, we help our customers every day along their journeys towards operational efficiency and excellence through the use of technology. However, we don’t always take time to examine our own internal practices through periods of extreme growth and success. It’s easy to just keep rolling along and ignore our own advice.

For many years, we struggled with a very manual process of putting our consultants’ expenses and receipts together for our customers. As the company grew from 10 consultants to over 70, our process became a huge burden. We were spending roughly 4 man-days printing, compiling, checking, and scanning receipts. 70 traveling consultants can produce over 2,000 receipts in a 2-week billing period!

If you’re a current Sunrise customer, you already know that we recently took the plunge and implemented the Concur Expense Management solution. Concur made life so much easier for all involved. Our consultants can now take photos of receipts with a mobile app provided by Concur, which also reads the receipt using OCR technology and inputs the critical information into the app such as the vendor, date, and total. The app enforces company-wide policies for attaching receipts and submitting reports. Back in the home office, we can now review and approve all reports online, with the reassurance that the software is mandating a matching receipt image. No more printing and compiling!

However, our MOST important consideration in this decision was our customers. In fact, if we couldn’t make this transition seamless and easy for our customers, we would not have done it. We needed a clean and efficient way to bill the expenses back to the customer and to provide a detailed report of each consultant’s expenses, including receipts. Concur delivered the functionality we needed to track billable expenses and receipts per customer.

The final expense report needed to be functional, but it also needed to look nice and represent the craftsman-like quality that our customers expect from us on a daily basis. We opted to use MicroStrategy to generate these documents for us. Our internal MicroStrategy consulting team was a joy to work with and they got the project done quickly.

The end result is amazing! MicroStrategy runs automatically during each billing cycle to generate, compress, and post the final reports on an internal server, which was already in place to house our expense reports for auditing purposes. Now we simply attach those reports from the server into our normal email to the customer. The process impact to the customer is minimal.

On average, our consultants went from spending 90 minutes on expense reports to only 30 minutes! Concur was easy to learn with its intuitive user interface, and is very convenient to use while traveling. This is a huge win when we consider that our consultants are typically working on these reports on the weekends. In the home office, we completely eliminated our dependence on paper and greatly reduced the time spent preparing the expense reports. Our customers now have an end report that’s easier to read and has the look and feel of other Sunrise documents, thanks to MicroStrategy.

We look forward to the next step in our journey towards improvement….stay tuned!

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

Information system implementations are not IT projects

Information system Implementations are not just it projects

Establishing accountability for the team to a higher goal

Guest Blogger: Chris Nealon, Supply Chain Consultant

If you ask the chef of a nuclear submarine what his primary duty is onboard he will reply, “the safety of every crew member on this vessel.” Strange response from a chef, right?

I recently read Professor John Sullivan’s paper, Improving project outcomes through operational reliability, after seeing him present the material at Wake Forest University. Sullivan’s work examines the relationship between High Reliability Organizations (HROs) like hospitals, or nuclear facilities and complex information systems implementations.

The major difference that Sullivan documents between HRO’s and complex IS systems like ERPs concerns the level of organization-wide support for the greater goal of the project. He underscores that the submarine chef’s level of accountability to the higher goal of submarine crew’s mission is unlikely to be matched by an employee of an organization implementing a new Information System.

Yes, Information System implementation failures do not carry the same gravity as HRO failures; HRO disasters yield tragedies like the USS Thresher and the Challenger Space Shuttle. Nonetheless, Sullivan highlights the similarities between HRO’s and complex Information Systems in terms of their expectations, risks, resource requirements, and consequences.

The wisdom that IS implementations can gain from Sullivan’s observations dictates that project managers should focus their efforts upfront and on education. Successful implementations hinge on a culture of understanding, reliability, communication, performance monitoring and ultimately, accountability. Simply stated, an information system implementation is not, and should not be considered an IT project; it is an organization-wide effort that relies on a comprehensive understanding of the overarching goal.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

How much time do you spend chasing data?

How Much Time Do You Waste Chasing Data?

Do you have a single source or are you getting your data from different places? It is not uncommon to see businesses allowing local decision making to box them into a situation where they have lots of data but very little information. Businesses need to think about if they have a strategy for understanding their data, both locally and globally.

When your product is sold around the world do you have the information that you need? Are you having to chase down that data and sort it out? Businesses need an explicit strategy of how they are going to operate in a global model. That data needs to be streamlined so useful information can be gathered making it easier to make the best business decisions quickly.

A good place for a business to start is with Microsoft Dynamics AX (now known as the cloud based ERP and CRM solution called Microsoft Dynamics 365) and making sure they have an implementation and consulting team that knows their business. Microsoft Dynamics AX is an enterprise system that has a single source of data, that’s easy to use and allows for flexibility in your operations. Combine that with an industry expert that has a Microsoft Gold ERP Competency and you’re on the right track to getting the data you need and turning it into information you can use to make great business decisions.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.

Evolution of the supply chain and Microsoft Dynamics AX

Evolution of the Supply Chain and Microsoft Dynamics AX

Written by Mike Pereira, Vice President at Sunrise Technologies

The Role of ERP and the Evolution of the Manufacturing Supply Chain

Manufacturing supply chains have gone through a lot of changes over the years. Having worked with Apparel and Footwear manufacturers and Furniture manufacturers for nearly two decades, we’ve witnessed these changes and how manufacturers have especially been impacted due to increased globalization and consumer demands. While the market opportunities are enormous for manufacturers today, inevitably the environment in which they operate has become more complex. As a result, companies must be agile to be able to compete in this complex supply chain environment or be left behind.

Twenty years ago manufacturing companies executed most, if not all, of the supply chain parts and components by themselves using a vertical or centralized supply chain. The manufacturer would basically be in control of the entire supply chain process from stocking raw materials to distribution. Enterprise resource planning (ERP) software was still the go-to supply chain system for many larger companies and was adequate because most of the supply chain data was stored within a single enterprise.

There was a shift in the late 1990s when U.S. manufacturers began outsourcing their operations to lower-cost suppliers across the globe. This changed the way manufacturers manage their supply chains, adding much more complexity of decisions and data from various vendors and locations. Today, supply chains continue to grow in complexity and with fluctuating global conditions; manufacturers are forced to reconsider their supply chain strategies and the technology used to manage them.

Many of the furniture and apparel manufacturers we work with today were full vertical manufacturers. For instance, apparel manufacturers would have started from yarn, potentially owning the yarn manufacturing and continuing all the way up to a finished garment, finally distributing to a customer or wholesaler. For the furniture industry, you may have started from a raw wood substrate and fabric type that culminated into a finished product of a sofa. One company would manage all of the manufacturing steps that were attached to each of those subcomponents. So the company was purchasing all of the raw materials that it took to make that product and all of the subcomponents. Not that this was simple to model, but it certainly remained under one administration for management and decision making.

Today, that supply chain network has become segregated. The purchasing has become a more complex situation. You are buying sub components of your final product; you are buying fabric, cut parts, and maybe even just buying the finished good, and adding a final attribution to the product for your customer. You are the marketing entity, you are the selling entity, you are the merchandising entity, but you are most likely not manufacturing the product.

So from an ERP system perspective, how do you model that divided supply chain? A good example would be a production order. In a traditional sense, you created a production order for your own manufacturing facility. If there were five steps in the manufacturing facility, you simply had the subcomponents that matched the five steps in your supply chain; you went to step one, you made the subcomponent, you packaged that subcomponent, sent it to step two, and continued to the finished product.

When you get into the divided supply chain, you have to accept and depend on the vendor’s ability to produce that production order, including communication to that vendor as to what that production order needs to look like. Management becomes not only a planning issue within your company, but also a management issue, understand and have visibility of that subcomponent’s production in their facility and in the supply chain.

So our customers may ask, “Do I model the vendor’s capacity and the vendor’s execution of that production order? Because in the traditional sense, it was all mine, I managed it all, and I ran it though my system, but now it’s somebody else doing the work, it’s somebody else’s manufacturing location. How much control and how much visibility do I even get to what my vendor is doing?” They may have a vendor in China, a vendor in India, and/or a vendor in Mexico, in their planning process. They must consider which vendor is the most economical to work with on this particular product during a particular time of the year, and what is the capability of that vendor to even produce that product, even if they are the least expensive option? What is their capacity? What kind of relationship do they already have with the vendor? What kind of control do I have over this subcomponent? There are many different decisions that have to be made involving vendor control and the global aspect of those decisions toward the planning process to create a complete product.

We must have a system that will allow us to handle these challenges by modeling the supply chain in the relationships that I just described, being able to handle a production and purchasing arrangement between the company and their vendors. Microsoft Dynamics AX can model very nicely the finished SKU or finished good and all of the subcomponents of the finished good. We cannot only create our internal steps or production routing, but we can also create what is called a subcontractor work order or subcontractor relationship that resides within that supply chain network. For example, my process in the U.S. as a manufacturer is to screen print on an NBA jersey, but I purchase the blank jersey from someone in China. I have an exclusive relationship with that vendor in China, by which I can model their capacity and by which I can model a production order that is going through that vendor’s facility. The issue is that in order to invoke that relationship, I am actually purchasing a service from them, as well as purchasing the product itself. So you have to have the ability to have a purchase order and a production order so that you track the execution of the production but you can also execute the purchase from that vendor, and that’s the difference in the supply chain today.

Microsoft Dynamics AX allows you to engage with that vendor by modeling a work center at the vendor location; therefore, you can model the capacity, you can model a production work order going through that capacity, and you can purchase the service which is associated to that production. Transportation logistics can be modeled from a distribution perspective as well. You can model a warehouse location at that vendor and you can model the warehouse location at the back end of your supply chain, finally connecting them with a transportation operation between. This allows full visibility to when it is produced, when it leaves the vendor’s factory, when it’s on the water, when it arrives at the port, then arriving at your distribution center where you can complete your necessary activities of the supply chain process and distribute to the customer.

Microsoft Dynamics AX truly allows you to model that global sourcing supply network, and with the multi-site/multi-location capabilities of AX, you are able to model different countries in different ways for that product. Product with varying prices across countries, varying costs and BOMs, etc… but at the end of the day it is the same finished good item.

As manufacturers become more concerned about the need for technology that is capable of working across a network of trading partners, our customers look to Microsoft Dynamics AX as their go-to ERP software of choice which plays a vital role in centralizing transaction data and managing the global supply chain.

Let’s look at some ways Microsoft Dynamics AX can help meet these challenges for Consumer Packaged Goods manufacturers.

  • Flexible Modeling to Meet Your Needs – Microsoft Dynamics AX offers flexibility through its unified models which provides a set of application concepts that reflect real-world business situations providing customers the flexibility to easily modify their organizational processes to meet their changing business needs. For instance, AX offers complete product modeling capabilities that can include the different variations of products being used within specific processes which helps prevent having to develop workarounds and invest in additional customizations to make the ERP fit in your product attributes.
  • Increase Visibility – Visibility leads to your service capability. When your vendor can update the status of the work in process, you will know when you can service that due date for that sales order. An integrated ERP solution like Microsoft Dynamics AX provides access to critical real-time information about customers, suppliers, products, processes and the data needed to make informed decisions. Whether you need up-to-date inventory levels or to check production schedules, with Microsoft Dynamics AX you get the real-time information and insight into the supply chain that you need.
  • Reduce and Control Costs – An inefficient and poorly managed supply chain can negatively impact every aspect of an organization, jeopardizing the performance of a company. With Microsoft Dynamics AX you can optimize your supply chain by centralizing data, standardizing processes, and gaining the visibility you need to optimize your business.

Manufacturers must embrace change if they want to make the improvements necessary to compete in this dynamic, increasingly complex industry. We’ve seen the companies which have successfully adapted and evolved their supply chain are now, not only the survivors in the industry, but have become the leaders in the market. While we are starting to see a shift that shows many companies’ manufacturing processes returning to the United States, and returning to a vertical manufacturing model, business will benefit from a system that is agile and powerful enough to work domestically and globally.

Start Your Journey with Sunrise Today!

 Whether you’re exploring your options for new business platforms, or ready to get started, we are trusted business partners for some of the world’s most well-known brands. With over 25 years of experience with the Microsoft stack, we can help you understand all the capabilities Microsoft has to offer.